Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of the Oxford High School shooter, is seeking to have her conviction for involuntary manslaughter overturned. Her new lawyer alleges that the prosecution made numerous missteps, including withholding evidence about secret deals with school witnesses. These witnesses testified against Crumbley in exchange for protection from prosecution themselves.
The defense argues that school officials who signed confidential agreements were trying to avoid prosecution by shifting blame onto Crumbley. They also maintain that the prosecution wrongfully charged Crumbley and failed to provide key evidence to the defense during trial. Crumbley’s lawyer argues that the prosecution is trying to have it both ways by portraying the shooter as an adult in his case, but a minor child in his mother’s case.
Despite the conviction, Crumbley’s lawyer is pushing for a new trial or acquittal on multiple grounds, including ineffective legal representation and flawed jury instructions. The prosecution has defended its handling of the case, stating that the Crumbleys could have prevented the shooting by disclosing key information to school officials.
The families of the victims have been advocating for school officials to be held accountable as well, but so far, no charges have been filed against them. The Attorney General has announced a state-led investigation into the shooting to determine if school officials engaged in any wrongdoing.
Overall, the case has raised questions about parental responsibility in school shootings, the duty of school officials to protect students, and the handling of evidence and legal proceedings in high-profile cases. The legal battle continues as multiple parties seek to challenge the convictions stemming from the tragic events at Oxford High School.
Photo credit
www.freep.com