Former President Donald Trump faced two consequential criminal cases this year, one involving classified documents and the other about attempting to overturn the 2020 election. However, the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling for former presidents derailed the trials, leaving voters without a final verdict. If Trump loses to Democrat Kamala Harris, he could face trials, but if he wins, his attorney general could end the cases. The delay in these trials shows the complexities of prosecuting a former president and the impact of legal hurdles and strategies of delay.
The case involving classified documents was dismissed by a Trump-appointed judge on the grounds of illegal appointment of the special counsel. In the election interference case, the indictment was slimmed down but still faces delays due to challenges from Trump’s legal team.
The road to holding a former president accountable through legal means is challenging and not always guaranteed. The cases reflect the difficulty of ensuring presidential accountability through legal proceedings. Despite the public’s expectation of adherence to legal boundaries, the process of holding a president accountable is complex and multifaceted. The cases against Trump further highlight these challenges in the pursuit of justice and accountability for a former president.
Source
Photo credit wtop.com
