Richard Glossip, an Oklahoma death row inmate seeking a new trial, has faced multiple execution dates and “last meals” due to previous appeals rejected by the Supreme Court. Oklahoma now agrees that recent evidence shows Glossip did not receive a fair trial in the 1997 murder of his boss. The key witness against him, who has since been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, lied on the stand. However, the state’s highest court refused to overturn his conviction, prompting Oklahoma to appeal to the Supreme Court for a new trial.
Prosecutorial misconduct, including evidence suppression and false testimonies, plays a common role in wrongful convictions, according to studies. Glossip was convicted based on his involvement in his boss’ murder, orchestrated by the motel’s maintenance man. Despite evidence showing that the key witness lied about his mental health, the victim’s family wants the sentence to be carried out without further delay, arguing that there was no prosecutorial error in Glossip’s case.
After years of delays, new evidence was uncovered showing prosecutorial misconduct, prompting Oklahoma to ask for a new trial for Glossip. The attorney general admitted to mistakes made during the trial process, highlighting the necessity of fair trials in capital punishment cases. Glossip’s attorney praised the attorney general for standing up against the injustice and advocating for a fair trial, even in a state known for its pro-death penalty stance.
Photo credit
www.usatoday.com