In a recent letter to the editor, a concerned reader has proposed retiring the term “tie-neck blouse,” which is often interpreted as a double entendre. The reader expressed discomfort with the term and suggested that a more appropriate name be used for this type of garment.
Our fashion critic delves into the origins of the tie-neck blouse, tracing it back to the early 20th century when it first gained popularity as a chic and feminine style. Originally known as the “ascot blouse,” this garment featured a bow or knot at the neckline, echoing the style of the ascot tie worn by men at the time.
Over the years, the term “tie-neck blouse” became more commonly used to describe this type of garment, with its association to both the ascot tie and the feminine bow adding a touch of sophistication to the blouse’s design. However, as fashion trends and societal norms have evolved, some have raised concerns about the term’s potential for misinterpretation.
While the term “tie-neck blouse” may have once been considered a playful nod to the garment’s design, it is important to consider how language can shape perceptions and contribute to a greater understanding of gender dynamics in fashion. The reader’s suggestion to retire this term in favor of a more neutral or descriptive name is a thoughtful proposal that invites us to reflect on the language we use to discuss fashion.
As the fashion industry continues to embrace diversity and inclusivity, it is crucial to be mindful of the impact that language can have on how we perceive and appreciate different styles and trends. By reevaluating the terminology we use to describe fashion, we can foster a more inclusive and respectful dialogue that celebrates the creativity and craftsmanship of designers and individuals alike.
Source
Photo credit www.nytimes.com